Silver Supporter
- Messages
- 10,384
- Reactions
- 17,897
I could see it for a heavy subsonic loads but not for a .223
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've been tempted by an original XP-100 in .221 Fireball at times, but never could really justify it. Right now the metallic silhouette shooting we do is informal and just for fun.
Remington's latest offering? Yah, can't think of any reason why I'd want one. More power to those that do though.
Agree... I enjoyed shooting that XP100 for fun, but not gonna spend my dough on it.
So in essence its worthless![]()
So in essence its worthless![]()
To me yes... whether or not someone else will buy... I guess Remington thought so. And Midway has them listed so.....![]()
This is not an AR style lower, it is a regular 700 bolt action with a short barrel and a chassis.I have no interest in this but if someone wanted a compact .223 in AR form couldn't u just use an upper that has no buffer tube such as brownells Brn-180? Then u could put a folding stock on it and have a compact .223 that is semi auto. Even with a 16" barrel it would still be very compact Cuz no buffer tube and u wouldn't just lose everything as gas and noise out the front of a short barrel (I realize the .223 is different scenario than subsonic 300blk etc. so just talking about .223 here).
I wouldn't go that far, but it is a very narrow niche indeed. For many shooters it would be pretty pointless though.
Not to mention it's butt-ugly like some kind of homemade experiment (I'm all for home made experiments btw ha ha ).I wouldn't go that far, but it is a very narrow niche indeed. For many shooters it would be pretty pointless though.
Not to mention it's butt-ugly like some kind of homemade experiment (I'm all for home made experiments btw ha ha ).