- Messages
- 3
- Reactions
- 0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Indeed. Because 2A readsIt's supposed to be one of the funnest rifles to shoot.
A well jolly populace, being necessary to the contentment of a free people, the right of the folk to keep and pew rimfires, shall not be infringed.
That makes sense. I've noticed Sportsmen's have put "restricted in your area" notices in the good stuffI can still pay for a 10/22 online through sportsmans, I believe because it does not have one or more of the scary "features"
I cannot however pay for a 15-22, likely because of the scary "features"
Just an observation, I do not claim to know the ins and outs of what has been lowered down upon the citizens of Washington.
"Assault weapon" and "Semiautomatic Assault Rifle" are two different legal categories in Washington law with completely different consequences.I'm quite positive that the 10/22 has been considered an assault weapon for a few years now in Washington.
Who ever said Democrats were great for firearms in general aside from gun sales?You can't purchase a three round fixed magazine 30.06 but you can purchase a 10/22 that accepts 25 round magazines, like somehow that won't take out a bunch of school children.
Further proof this is not about safety.
The 10/22 Compact is 34" OAL. My takedown with a Magpul stock is 35".Does anyone know if any 10/22's are under 30 inches?
Yes that's my interpretation too. I just thought I'd see other people's opinions.Directly from the text of HB1240;
(2)(a) "Assault weapon" means:
(ii) A semiautomatic rifle that has an overall length of less than 30 inches;
(iv) A semiautomatic, center fire rifle that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and has one or more of the following: (A) A grip that is independent or detached from the stock that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon. The addition of a fin attaching the grip to the stock does not exempt the grip if it otherwise resembles the grip found on a pistol; (B) Thumbhole stock; (C) Folding or telescoping stock; (D) Forward pistol, vertical, angled, or other grip designed for use by the nonfiring hand to improve control; (E) Flash suppressor, flash guard, flash eliminator, flash hide sound suppressor, silencer, or any item designed to reduce the visual or audio signature of the firearm; (F) Muzzle brake, recoil compensator, or any item designed to be affixed to the barrel to reduce recoil or muzzle rise; (G) Threaded barrel designed to attach a flash suppressor, sound suppressor, muzzle break, or similar item; (H) Grenade launcher or flare launcher; or (I) A shroud that encircles either all or part of the barrel designed to shield the bearer's hand from heat, except a solid forearm of a stock that covers only the bottom of the barrel;
I am not a lawyer but a Ruger 10/22 does not appear to meet that definition. I can't find anything further in the bill which seems to include rimfire firearms.
Are you joking or serious?Welcome to absurdity heights.
The marlin model 60 is also on the scary guns list version 1639.
Super cereal. The nylon 66 family is also on the list of "SAR" firearms.Are you joking or serious?
Safe zone until they move the field goals.I guess I'm in the safe zone. All my 22s are tube feed.
Directly from the text of HB1240;I can still pay for a 10/22 online through sportsmans, I believe because it does not have one or more of the scary "features"
I cannot however pay for a 15-22, likely because of the scary "features"
Just an observation, I do not claim to know the ins and outs of what has been lowered down upon the citizens of Washington.
"Should" not include !!??Directly from the text of HB1240;
(2)(a) "Assault weapon" means:
(ii) A semiautomatic rifle that has an overall length of less than 30 inches;
(iv) A semiautomatic, center fire rifle
Would not include the 15-22!!??