114 does suck, if enacted, but until it's enacted, it makes no difference in any legal or liability sense for the suppliers. OR is no different than any other state where magazine purchases are perfectly legal. The only time they would have any legal exposure would be selling and shipping in mags to OR after it was illegal for them to do so. There is no retroactive liability for any mags sold and shipped into OR prior to them being made illegal.To me 114 is a deadly snake that will bite any manufacturer that gets close. It's not just that they could be breaking the law but they open themselves up to the court system.
Suppose Midway sends a bunch of mags to a man who uses them in a school shooting? Midway would be deep pockets and hung out to dry. Today's courts can't be counted on for justice for the most part and I wouldn't risk selling to Oregon.
Along about April when the credit card companies start tracking ammo sales, I suspect the data will be stored for a future purpose.
In the example, that's really true of any mfg/suppler, but 114 has no affect pro or con in that. Attempts will always be made to sue anyone and everyone even remotely connected to a tragedy if it's legally allowable or not.
The basic facts are that there is currently no mag ban in OR. It's perfectly legal for any supplier to ship any capacity mag into Oregon and there are no legal repercussion... now or later... for them to do so. The even bigger slap in the face is that they are not only limiting 10+ mags from shipping, but "any" mag of "any" capacity with a removeable end plate.
With the TRO in place though, no provision of 114 exists and has zero legal ramifications for suppliers. There really is no "valid" reason companies like Midway can give, other than... "our legal team has reccomended we don't"... but have offered no explaination or legal basis for their reasoning. Quite honestly, there is none.