www.eurasiantimes.com
They could sell them to India - but Canada & India are not on good speaking terms right now; just a little thing about India assassinating (or plotting to) someone in Canada??"Oh no, can't have the great unwashed peons have access to surplus military arms"
Or better yet, to the US C&R dealers?
after all, we are who they usually depend on when it comes to air defense and naval defense. Edit there are a minimum of 11,000 US firearm owners who'd love to get their hands on WW2 Hi Power pistols "lack of parts availibility" is IMO, a BS excuseWhat do you think? Grade those Hi-Power's in three grades and sell them for $400.00-$995.00? Maybe more?
I would LOVE to have one of those with some honest wear on it. The statement about lack of parts availability? Just how much would the Kanuckians have been shooting those? It's not like they've been on the battlefield through thick-and-thin like our 1911s?
Major bummer.
there are plenty of parts one can get for Hi-Power handguns internationally, especially the US and Europe. Heck, Canada could send them to Europe; say back to the Belgians ? 
Loonie . 
www.thearmorylife.com
Yeah - the USCG said the same thing about the 52' MLBs; that they could not find parts for them - which is BS; the 6-71 DD engine is ubiquitous and lots of parts out there for them. Or they could just replace them with a newer engine. So they took the 52's out of service and did not replace them - yet. Stupid - the best long range MLB in their fleet and they shelved them."lack of parts availibility" is IMO, a BS excuse
Mikej - 1.1 million Canadians served in World War II, with approximately 42,000 killed and another 55,000 wounded. The Canadian Forces were involved in the 1950–1953 Korean War and its aftermath. More than 30,000 Canadians participated on the side of the United Nations, and Canada sent eight destroyers. Canadian aircraft provided transport, supply and logistics. 516 Canadians died, 312 of which were from combat. After the war, Canadian troops remained for three years as military observers. Canada's role in the Afghanistan War began in late 2001. Canada sent its first element of soldiers secretly in October 2001 from Joint Task Force 2,[1] and the first contingents of regular Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) troops arrived in Afghanistan in January–February 2002. Canada's role in the Afghan conflict grew in 2006 when Canadian troops relieved US forces in Kandahar province, taking command of the multinational brigade in the region during a major Taliban offensive. The CAF had the highest per-capita casualty rate among coalition members. 159 Canadian soldiers died on missions in theater and another 22 died in non-combat circumstances.
By my math from interweb stats, in 2021 there were 169 homicides in Canada from handguns. There were 274 deaths from nutritional deficiencies. Perhaps they should focus on feeding their people instead of taking their guns away."Oh no, can't have the great unwashed peons have access to surplus military arms"
I'm well aware Canada had involvement in the wars. Somehow I wouldn't think that Canada would be arming their military/police/what ever, with surplus arms. Kind of like U.S. various police forces weren't issued 1911s and used them up to current times.
The difference will be if they are using M17/18 is the manual safety. The cases in the US have 320s with no manual safety. Sig has now had 12 cases dismissed and won one case at trial (to be fair, the finding was not that the gun did not go off, but that the plaintiff did not meet the burden of proof).
