Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 4,966
- Reactions
- 12,108
Several shooters were called out as problems, but because it wasn't 1975, authorities wouldn't do anything and neighbors risked more by getting actively involved.I think the point is being missed. If someone wanted to prevent mass shootings by focusing on the shooter, they have the weapon or the person. Andy makes the point that it isn't the weapon's fault, so the focus should be on the shooter. But these type of crimes frequently involve people that aren't already criminals, and might be subject to red flags, but those are also opposed. Which is a large reason why people upset about mass shootings default to the gun, since they can't do anything about the people.
Not a defense of gun control as much as saying "So what do we suggest?" And the answer never comes.
Strong male figures in neighborhoods not only offer the potential to stomp out a weirdo, they can also mentor, direct or advise the young man (usually), and avoid the event.
My father wasn't around but I luckily had a few fathers that weren't afraid to let you know you were being stupid or put on a pair of boxing gloves and figure it out. Or learn how to lose and not expect a trophy.
The young males who do these are almost never a surprise.