Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 97
- Reactions
- 76
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agreed. Likely just a tooling/machining mark. Even for a cheapo mfg... it would make utterly no sense whatsoever to incur the material, time and labor costs trying to mate two pieces of tubing together for a $5 part that likely only costs them a mere fraction of that.I see the line but I strongly doubt it's a two piece tube. Just a manufacturing blemish I'd bet
its not clear. The only way a 2 piece would work is if they were swaged together to seal the gas.While I agree that two pieces seems improbable, it sure looks like it to me...???
View attachment 1839314
I'll call it second hand...a friend bought it new, set it in his safe, lost interest and never fired it. I snagged it from him and stored it until recently...it's never been fired by either of us.It almost looks like there's two, maybe a blemish from factory or from previous owner disassembling/assembling since it sounds like you got it used??
View attachment 1839200
I might be missing something, but it looks normal to me. The Technical Data Package (TDP) for the M16 and M4 has drawings and specs for all components, including the gas tube, The drawings for the gas tube has a primary design and approved secondary/tertiary designs, as shown below. Note the differences in the diameter at the end and at the middle. Of course, civilian gas tubes don't need to follow these specs, but most do or use the spec as a basis for their products.
View attachment 1839248
Agree'd.This looks like the answer...
Just dug out a spare mid-length I have still new in the package from Stoner...and it has the same diameter change...just makes me wonder why...its not clear. The only way a 2 piece would work is if they were swaged together to seal the gas.
Youd have to take the same closer detail pic from the other side/angle to see if the smaller diameter is inserted into the bigger.
But from here it looks like its just sized down like msgriffs blueprint spec shows.
its a good question.and it has the same diameter change...just makes me wonder why...
A lot of that is from the original hand-guard system. It is keept in the spec now for backwards compatibility and because it is unknown how many other aftermarket devices or components rely on it. This is one of the few disadvantages of the "lego" system in action; a whole lot of specs get added and are kept because no one knows the real impact of removing them. Sure it may be better to make a uniform tube, but not if it suddenly compromises the fit and function of an unknown number of other components.I'll call it second hand...a friend bought it new, set it in his safe, lost interest and never fired it. I snagged it from him and stored it until recently...it's never been fired by either of us.
Agree'd.
Just dug out a spare mid-length I have still new in the package from Stoner...and it has the same diameter change...just makes me wonder why...
This is my understanding of why:its a good question.
Seems like there is no need but I did a quick check on Midway for several gas tubes and they all had this diameter change. Maybe it reduces barrel vibration where the gas tube inserts into the upper receiver (less contact).
except what I see on your print above is its not turned down all the way to the end.If they didn't turn down the OD at the end, it wouldn't be able to interface with the gas key,
Correct, the bell at the end which interfaces the gas key has a reference diameter of 0.180". Of course, that portion of the gas tube never contacts the upper, except incidentally during installation. I'm talking about the area of the gas tube that is located within the gas tube opening in the upper, which provides clearance for movement.except what I see on your print above is its not turned down all the way to the end.
I think I get it now. So as the BCG moves into battery any misalignment with the gas tube allows it to flex home... ?Correct, the bell at the end which interfaces the gas key has a reference diameter of 0.180". Of course, that portion of the gas tube never contacts the upper, except incidentally during installation. I'm talking about the area of the gas tube that is located within the gas tube opening in the upper, which provides clearance for movement.
Yes. I could calculate the total tolerance of where the center of the gas key mouth can be and still be in spec, but I would have to reference 3 or 4 separate component drawings. I would also have to take into account acceptable wear, which is in a different document set.I think I get it now. So as the BCG moves into battery any misalignment with the gas tube allows it to flex home... ?