Does this answer your question?The real question: "Is there a judge in the state with enough authority, and constitution to issue an injunction like in Illinois?"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does this answer your question?The real question: "Is there a judge in the state with enough authority, and constitution to issue an injunction like in Illinois?"
This is a message I sent to the Washington State Bar Association (jennifero@wsbaorg, [email protected], [email protected])Does this answer your question?
I read a study once that said that the majority of people who pass law school have never actually read the Constitution in its entirety. That appears to be true.This is a message I sent to the Washington State Bar Association (jennifero@wsbaorg, [email protected], [email protected])
-----------------
Jennifer,
Can you explain how it is that someone who is a member of the Washington State Bar was nominated by Senator Murray for a position as Federal Judge, and then revealed to be totally incompetent on national TV?
https://nypost.com/2023/01/26/biden-judicial-nominee-stumped-by-questions-about-the-constitution/
https://www.mywsba.org/PersonifyEbusiness/LegalDirectory/LegalProfile.aspx?Usr_ID=000000030917
I think we all know the answer to how this happened. Unfortunately, this demonstrates that the being certified by the Washington State Bar only means that the person passed the "diversity" tests.
WBA's organizational self-awareness is so corrupted that it doesn't even realize that it has hit rock bottom in terms of professionalism. I don't think anyone at WBA is even embarrassed!
Is there a rule that says you can't have a specific thread with a specific question separate from another specific thread with a different specific question about the same bill?It seems to me that any "part" used to assemble a SA rifle will be considered an assault rifle in and of itself? Is that accurate? So assuming it passes, after the effective date, BCGs, triggers, spare parts, replacement barrels won't be shipped to WA?
View attachment 1356176
Time will tell but that's they way I read it too.It seems to me that any "part" used to assemble a SA rifle will be considered an assault rifle in and of itself? Is that accurate? So assuming it passes, after the effective date, BCGs, triggers, spare parts, replacement barrels won't be shipped to WA?
View attachment 1356176
The way I read it is only to an FFL and then you have to take your gun to them for "repair."Time will tell but that's they way I read it too.
According to the writing yes, but anyone who owns these guns already are grandfathered in and companies like Areo Precision will continue to operate with the ability to ship and sell out of state...... But I'm hopeful that is not true so i can purchase replacement parts and just lower receivers are blocked.....It seems to me that any "part" used to assemble a SA rifle will be considered an assault rifle in and of itself? Is that accurate? So assuming it passes, after the effective date, BCGs, triggers, spare parts, replacement barrels won't be shipped to WA?
View attachment 1356176
^Another "drop" thread... there must be another term people can use.
Anything in process will be denied, form 1 or existing form 4. It will have to be in your hand when the governor lifts the pen from the paper.Here's another question. If HB 1240 is signed will you still be able to transfer NFA items into your trust? What happens to NFA stamps that are in process before the bill is signed?
So how will that effect the owners of braced pistols under the new ATF rules that will post to the register tomorrow? Will a person still be able to apply for an NFA tax stamp?Anything in process will be denied, form 1 or existing form 4. It will have to be in your hand when the governor lifts the pen from the paper.
Sounds like we Washingtonians are screwed. No way you'll get a form1 back before Inslee signs it into law.So how will that effect the owners of braced pistols under the new ATF rules that will post to the register tomorrow? Will a person still be able to apply for an NFA tax stamp?
What about transferring ownership of said item into your personal trust?
If a Form 1 can't be done on a braced firearm that you already own after the AWB is signed then the only legal recourse I see for us is to keep it as a pistol without the brace.Sounds like we Washingtonians are screwed. No way you'll get a form1 back before Inslee signs it into law.
That would work, especially if using a sling instead of a brace Fe. And the hope would be that there will be an injunction and eventually a court order against this bs brace rule.If a Form 1 can't be done on a braced firearm that you already own after the AWB is signed then the only legal recourse I see for us is to keep it as a pistol without the brace.
A braced pistol will already be considered an AW if it has enough evil features (which they pretty much all do). For example, if it accepts a detachable magazine and has a threaded barrel .So how will that effect the owners of braced pistols under the new ATF rules that will post to the register tomorrow? Will a person still be able to apply for an NFA tax stamp?
What about transferring ownership of said item into your personal trust?
Those people who wrote that bill are real dicks.A braced pistol will already be considered an AW if it has enough evil features (which they pretty much all do). For example, if it accepts a detachable magazine and has a threaded barrel .
I fully understand that. I'm trying to figure out how the AWB will effect Form 1's (new ATF rule) and transfers into a personal trust of currently owned weapons which will be grandfathered in.A braced pistol will already be considered an AW if it has enough evil features (which they pretty much all do). For example, if it accepts a detachable magazine and has a threaded barrel .
I can't see how it would, considering you aren't creating a new AW.I fully understand that. I'm trying to figure out how the AWB will effect Form 1's (new ATF rule) and transfers into a personal trust of currently owned weapons which will be grandfathered in.
I think the answer is most likely this:I can't see how it would, considering you aren't creating a new AW.
Anything in process will be denied, form 1 or existing form 4. It will have to be in your hand when the governor lifts the pen from the paper.