- Messages
- 39
- Reactions
- 92
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks for the reply.I'd keep 'em.
They are not made any longer and were made to a better standard , quality wise than many rifles of today.
In the interest of honestly here.....
I must also state that I am not a fan of the Ruger 10/22 series.
Nothing "wrong" with it....just that there are many out there...and the design does nothing for me.
Andy
I agree with this wholeheartedly.I'd keep 'em.
They are not made any longer and were made to a better standard , quality wise than many rifles of today.
Mossberg .22 rifles ( And the Ward's Western Field ) shoot very nicely as a general rule.
In the interest of honestly here.....
I must also state that I am not a fan of the Ruger 10/22 series.
Nothing "wrong" with it....just that there are many out there...and the design does nothing for me.
Andy
The 511 was made for a couple of decades. The 511-X was only made in 1965 and 66. Supposedly. The X has an "improved" rear sight. One of the Nylon 66's I had used this kind of rear sight, with a kind of elevation adjustment dial on it that could be turned with a penny coin.Love your Remington 511....looking for one myself.
I have a Remington 510 from 1941 and a Remington 512 from 1942....just need the 511 and a 513.
Another thing nice about .22 rifles, they tend to cost less than rimfires.The 511 was made for a couple of decades. The 511-X was only made in 1965 and 66. Supposedly. The X has an "improved" rear sight. One of the Nylon 66's I had used this kind of rear sight, with a kind of elevation adjustment dial on it that could be turned with a penny coin.
Another thing nice about .22 rifles, they tend to cost less than rimfires.
My bad. Centerfires.Another thing nice about .22 rifles, they tend to cost less than rimfires.
Kinda what I figgered. And for the most part, correct.My bad. Centerfires.